Home Articles H-Blog ‘Nuclear race: Will the UK take moral lead?’ - Church of Scotland rep

‘Nuclear race: Will the UK take moral lead?’ - Church of Scotland rep

E-mail Print PDF
‘Nuclear race: Will the UK take moral lead?’ - Church of Scotland rep

http://rt.com/op-edge/234435-church-scotland-nuclear-race/

Get short URL
Published time: February 21, 2015 17:55

Trident nuclear submarine (image from wikipedia.org by Canoe1967)

67142

Tags


Nuclear, Politics, Protest, Religion, UK

The Church of Scotland wants to stop the hypocrisy of the nuclear
race, and called on the UK to lead the disarmament, Reverend Doctor
Graham Blount told RT after the Church of England urged standing up
against the renewal of the Trident weapons system.

Earlier this month, the Church of England sent out a letter urging its
members to protest the renewal of the UK’s Trident system, the
countries key nuclear weapons system. Both the Church of England and
Scotland have come together to discourage the costly renewal project.

Scotland houses four submarines armed with nuclear-capable Trident
missiles. Scotland’s ruling party, the Scottish National party is
against the program’s renewal. The UK parliament is expected to vote
on the issue in 2016, after the general election in May this year. The
cost of renewal is estimated at over $30 billion.

RT spoke with Reverend Doctor Graham Blount, the Church of Scotland’s
Active Council Secretary, on the Church’s position on nuclear
disarmament.

RT: What is the Church of Scotland’s position on nuclear weapons?

Reverend Doctor Graham Blount: For over 30 years now, the General
Assembly of the Church of Scotland has expressed its very strong
opposition to nuclear weapons and its belief that nuclear weapons are
inherently indiscriminate and therefore inherently evil. And therefore
in the strongest of terms, we have condemned the possession of nuclear
weapons by our own government and by other governments.

Read more'Wrap up Trident!': Protest in London against £100bn nuke
replacement plan

RT: Would you say people in Scotland share the Church’s view on
nuclear weapons? Why is it such a hot button issue in Scotland?

GB: There are certainly many people in Scotland who share the Church’s
opposition to our possession of nuclear weapons. It’s particularly an
issue within Scotland because the United Kingdom’s capability for
nuclear weapons is based in Scotland.

RT: Why is the Church’s opposed to the nuclear base?

GB: I would have to say that the Church of Scotland’s opposition to
nuclear weapons as a matter of principle is a very long-standing one
through a number of changes. It began in the 1980s in a very different
context and continues to the present day. Many representatives of the
Church of Scotland have taken part in demonstrations. And our
opposition has been strongly expressed to government many times over
that period.

Our government says that it supports multilateral nuclear disarmament,
and obviously we would welcome that, but multilateral disarmament
tends to mean countries that have nuclear weapons will say to other
countries that we will give up our weapons after you’ve given up
yours. And nobody is prepared to make the first move. We need to be
serious in our conversations about this and get beyond the hypocrisy
of banning other countries from having nuclear weapons while retaining
them ourselves.

RT: But nuclear weapons can also be a restraining mechanism, can’t they?

GB: Nuclear weapons are, as I’ve said, inherently indiscriminate. If
they were used the destruction would be widespread and could in no
sense be targeted. We sometimes persuade ourselves that other forms of
modern weaponry can be very precisely targeted at those that are the
intended targets. Nuclear weapons go well beyond any kind of
possibility of targeting and are indiscriminate. The effects are
really beyond our ability to measure at this stage. In that sense, the
destructiveness of these is inherently evil.

Read more‘Ticking time bomb’: Watchdogs slam UK nuclear weapons maker
over safety practices

RT: Could the government incorporate the Church position into
political discussion?

GB: I think our perspective comes clearly from a set of faith-based
values that go beyond the day-to-day intricacies of political
discussion. We would hope that these values would inform political
discussion not only in our own country but in other countries too.
Obviously our concern is with our own government’s possession, but
we’re concerned that other governments possess nuclear weapons.
They’re inherently evil in whosever’s hands they are.

RT: Why do your calls for disarmament come now?

GB: This is a critical moment because a decision is shortly to be
taken by the United Kingdom parliament about the replacement of the
current Trident system. Therefore this a moment for us all to stop and
think and reconsider the effect that nuclear weapons would have if
used. To consider the kind of things that could be done positively
with the resources that we are contemplating wasting with a new
generation of nuclear weapons.

RT: Do the Churches of England and Scotland see eye to eye on the issue?

GB: I think that there is some difference of opinion between Scotland
and England on this and differences surveys suggest that the feelings
might be slightly different. But what we’re talking about here is the
national church in England saying exactly the same thing as the
national church in Scotland is saying. Both of these churches are
seeking to give a moral leadership within this debate. Those in
Scotland who want to get rid of nuclear weapons would not feel we had
achieved a great deal if these nuclear weapons were only moved to the
other side of a border with England. We want to get rid of nuclear
weapons. That is a priority.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 24 February 2015 14:56  

Newsflash

IMMEDIATE USE 16 NOV 2015
PEOPLE FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT NSW
AUSTRALIA/INDIA U-DEAL SELLS URANIUM DIRECTLY INTO SUBCONTINENTAL NUCLEAR ARMS RACE

The India-Australia uranium deal, whereby Australia agrees to sell uranium to India in spite of India's not being a signatory of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty, and in spite of the fact that a vigorous nuclear arms race is in progress on the subcontinent, beggars belief for anyone who has been involved for decades as I have, in questions of nuclear nonproliferation, disarmament, and nuclear safety.