WED 7 SEPT IMMEDIATE USE
PEOPLE FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT
HUMAN SURVIVAL PROJECT
HYPOCRISY OVER NK, US, MISSILE TESTS
THE US TESTED A MISSILE ON MONDAY – NO SANCTIONS, NO ATTENTION.
NK TESTED THREE MISSILES SAME DAY: SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS, SANCTIONS
On  Monday 5th, the United States tested a Minuteman-III missile. The  Minuteman-III missile is an exceedingly well-tested system. We know it  works. The Minuteman-III is capable of carrying multiple warheads of up  to a megaton in power, though the usual size is a few hundreds of  kilotons. The US tests its Minuteman-III missiles usually three times a  year, though there has been a 'gap' of 6 months most recently. The US  and Russia keep just under 2000 warheads on missiles in a status such  that they can be launched in less than a minute, and targeted at each  other. Their use would destroy civilisation.
The minuteman-III  test attracted essentially no attention whatsoever apart from  self-congratulatory items in local California media. There was certainly  no talk of security council resolutions or sanctions.
On  exactly the same day, the DPRK launched three missiles of much lesser  capability than the Minuteman-III, and with much less assurance that  they would fly at all rather than exploding on the launch pad as in  previous tests.
The DPRK may have ten or 15 primitive,  Hiroshima-size (10-15Kt) warheads, which it may or may not be able to  fit onto a missile that will fly.
The DPRK missile test has  attracted international headlines, a UN Security Council resolution, and  threats of increased sanctions.
Yet it is the US and Russia,  and not the DPRK both now and in the foreseeable future, that really  have the ability to destroy the world.
When will a minuteman-III  test at Vandenberg, or a Topol-M test at Plesetsk, or an Agni test at  Odisha, attract the same level of condemnation, and the same sanctions  as a DPRK missile test?
Only then will we begin to make progress to the elimination of nuclear weapons.
And if we fail to make such progress our prospects as a species are going to be problematic.
John Hallam
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
 This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
61-4-6987-4984
h61-2-9810-2598
 
            
 
            
          


 Articles 

